
A fierce storm of public outrage has swept across the United Kingdom in late 2025, reigniting heated debates over the royal titles held by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The controversy exploded following King Charles III’s unprecedented decision to formally strip his brother, Prince Andrew, of his “Prince” title, HRH status, and other honors, reducing him to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and evicting him from Royal Lodge. This historic move, announced in October and formalized in November via Letters Patent, marked the first time in modern history a blood prince lost his birthright title due to ongoing scandals linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
The action against Andrew has set a powerful precedent, fueling widespread calls for similar measures against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Millions of Britons are questioning whether Harry and Meghan, who stepped back from senior royal duties in 2020 and relocated to California, should retain their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles. Critics argue that the couple’s repeated public criticisms of the monarchy—through interviews, a Netflix series, and Harry’s memoir—have damaged the institution’s reputation, much like Andrew’s associations did.
Public sentiment remains overwhelmingly negative toward the Sussexes. Surveys throughout 2025 consistently show low favorability ratings, with Meghan often ranking among the most disliked public figures globally and Harry not far behind. Many view their continued use of royal titles in commercial ventures and personal branding as profiting from the Crown while distancing themselves from its responsibilities. Royal historians note that while the monarch can revoke HRH styles relatively easily, removing peerages like Duke or Duchess typically requires parliamentary action—though Andrew’s demotion has demonstrated the Crown’s willingness to act decisively to protect its image.
Insiders suggest Prince William, as future king, is particularly focused on slimming down the monarchy and preventing further embarrassments from non-working royals. Reports indicate he may prioritize revoking titles from those no longer actively serving, including Harry and Meghan, to modernize and safeguard the institution. Some observers warn that such a step could deepen family rifts but would align with efforts to restore public trust amid declining support for certain royals.
Defenders of the Sussexes point out key differences: unlike Andrew’s legal and ethical controversies, Harry and Meghan’s issues stem from personal grievances and a desire for independence. They agreed not to use HRH publicly after Megxit but have retained their ducal titles, which they argue provide legacy and opportunities for their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
As 2025 draws to a close, the debate shows no signs of abating. With the monarchy navigating health challenges, evolving public expectations, and internal reforms, the question looms large: Will Harry and Meghan face the same fate as Andrew, or will their titles endure as a remnant of their royal past? The nation watches intently, divided yet captivated by this ongoing saga.