Prince Harry’s longtime friend, Nacho Figueras, has made a surprising revelation that is stirring conversation in royal circles.

The Argentine polo player, known for his close bond with the Duke of Sussex, recently made comments that have led to intense speculation regarding the true identity of Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter, Lilibet Diana.

Figueras, who has always been a vocal supporter of Harry, unintentionally ignited debate during a recent interview.

His remarks have prompted discussions about potential undisclosed details surrounding the Sussexes’ carefully curated public image.

During the interview, Figueras was asked about his relationship with Prince Harry and their private discussions over the years. At one point, he reportedly acknowledged that Harry had confided in him about certain “fabrications” related to Lilibet.

His choice of words has fueled speculation, leading many to wonder if he inadvertently revealed a hidden truth that Meghan and Harry have taken great efforts to keep private.

The notion that Lilibet’s identity might not fully align with public perception isn’t new. However, Figueras’ remarks have reignited this debate, raising questions about whether the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are withholding certain details about their daughter.

For years, skeptics have questioned why Harry and Meghan have been exceptionally private about Lilibet compared to other royal children. Unlike Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, who have been regularly seen at public events, Lilibet has made very few public appearances. Even the photos released by the Sussexes have been scrutinized, with some critics suggesting they appear edited or selectively curated.

Adding to the intrigue, Lilibet’s christening was held privately in California, far from the traditional royal ceremonies in the UK. The lack of transparency surrounding these events has only fueled further speculation.

The relationship between the Sussexes and the royal family has long been a topic of discussion, especially after their decision to name their daughter Lilibet—a cherished childhood nickname of the late Queen Elizabeth II.

At the time, many saw it as a possible attempt at reconciliation. However, insiders have suggested that it was more of a strategic move to maintain their royal connection despite stepping away from official duties.

If there were any discrepancies surrounding Lilibet’s identity, some speculate this could have played a role in the growing tensions between Harry, Meghan, and the late Queen. Could this be one of the hidden reasons behind their increasing distance from the royal family?

As expected, Meghan’s PR team has been working hard to dismiss these claims as baseless speculation. However, Figueras is no ordinary source—he is one of Harry’s closest confidants, making his comments all the more intriguing.

If someone as trusted as Figueras suggests possible inconsistencies, it raises the question: did Harry reveal something in a vulnerable moment that Meghan had hoped to keep private?

While the Sussexes continue to protect their privacy, Figueras’ remarks have reignited interest in the mysteries surrounding their daughter. The real question remains—what, if anything, are Meghan and Harry concealing, and why?

As the speculation continues, only time will tell whether further revelations will bring clarity or deepen the intrigue surrounding Lilibet Diana and the Sussexes’ ever-evolving narrative.