The NFL is considering changing overtime rules in the regular season to decrease the advantage for teams that win the coin toss.

“It’s time to rethink the overtime rule,” league executive Troy Vincent said Wednesday at the NFL scouting combine.

Vincent said the competition committee agrees overtime rules need to be addressed. Receiving the ball first has become more of an advantage than pre-2011 when overtime was a sudden-death period. Receiving teams won 56.8% of games in overtime from 2017 to 2024, up from 55.4% from 2001 to 2011.

Current rules give both teams an opportunity to possess the ball in overtime unless a touchdown is scored on the first possession.

The rules are different in the playoffs. Both teams get a chance to have a possession even if the offense scores a touchdown on the opening drive. That postseason change came after the Buffalo Bills lost to the Kansas City Chiefs in a divisional round game in January 2022.

Making the overtime rules the same in the regular season is a possible solution, along with extending the period to 15 minutes.

Among other changes, the NFL plans to use its virtual measuring system to determine first downs in 2025. This wouldn’t eliminate the officials who manually spot the ball and use chains to mark the line to gain. The optimal tracking system notifies officiating instantly if a first down was gained after the ball is spotted by hand.

“We used this in the background last season,” said Kimberly Fields, the NFL’s senior vice president of football operations. “The goal for 2025 is to continue to train our techs, who are the ones who will be utilizing the technology, finalizing all of our officiating processes and procedures around virtual measurements and testing the graphics for the broadcast and in-stadium, so fans in the stadium and fans watching on television can see what we’re doing. The chain crew will still be there as backup.”

The competition committee also will review expansion of the replay assist to include more fouls, but Vincent said “there was no appetite” from the committee to use video replay to throw a flag.

A team could still propose a rule change to do that. For now, if officials miss an obvious penalty such as a face mask, replay assist can’t throw a flag.

Replay assist was used in 2024 to pick up flags thrown for roughing the passer (contact with head/neck), unnecessary roughness (runner out of bounds), intentional grounding and ineligible player downfield.

Expansion under consideration for 2025 would include roughing the passer (hit below the knee), unnecessary roughness (defenseless receiver/player), face mask (contact of hand with face mask), tripping, illegal crackback block and horse-collar tackle, among others.

Vincent said the league wanted to find a way to bring back onside kicks while also installing a permanent kickoff rule after a one-year trial with what was called the dynamic kickoff.

The trial made kickoffs more exciting with higher rate of returns. Vincent said he anticipated the spot of the touchback on kickoffs being moved from the 30- to the 35-yard line.

But the changes affected the onside kick. Teams were 3 for 50, the lowest recovery rate since 2001.

“Universal consensus that we know we need to do something with this play,” Vincent said.

He added there wasn’t much conversation around a fourth-and-long option to keep possession, though those discussions could occur next month.

The tush push play mastered by the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles has been a hot topic this week because the Green Bay Packers proposed banning it. Some opponents have argued the play is dangerous, but Vincent said the league found no injuries on the play in 2024.

The potential NFL overtime rule change could significantly impact the fan experience, making games more exciting and fairer. One of the biggest complaints from fans has been how some teams win in overtime without the opposing team getting a chance to respond. If the new rule ensures both teams have equal opportunities in extra time, it could lead to more dramatic finishes, keeping fans on the edge of their seats. A fairer and more competitive overtime format would also reduce frustration among supporters who feel their team lost due to an unfair system rather than actual performance on the field.

Additionally, a change in the overtime structure could mean longer, more intense games, which would be a win for fans who love high-stakes football. More thrilling moments, extended rivalries, and strategic decision-making could make games even more engaging, leading to a better overall viewing experience. If done right, this change could not only improve fairness but also make the NFL even more entertaining for its massive fanbase.