NFL star is the subject of an apparent contract release which proves his relationship with Taylor Swift is fake.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Controversy – Desert Oasis Weekly

Travis Kelce’s representatives were forced to deny claims that the Kansas City Chiefs tight end planned to break up with Taylor Swift later this month.

The allegations stem from a document, purportedly created by Kelce’s PR firm, Full Scope, which suggests that the relationship between Kelce and Swift is not genuine.

The document reportedly outlines a contractual agreement for the two celebrities to announce their breakup on September 28, however he has now instructed his legal team to start proceedings against those who have publicized this alleged document.

What was in the alleged document?

Taylor Swift Breaks Silence On 'Fake' Relationship With Travis Kelce

The document, titled “Comprehensive Media Plan for Travis Kelce’s Public Relations Following Breakup with Taylor Swift,” details a plan to release an official statement a few days after the breakup.

This statement would be shared three days after the split, aiming to “allow the initial media frenzy to settle and ensure clarity.” The plan emphasizes a “gracious, respectful” tone that stresses mutual respect between the two.

“Travis and Taylor have decided to part ways after careful consideration. They both value and respect each other’s personal lives and appreciate your respect for privacy during this time. They are both committed to their careers and personal growth. They remain friends and wish each other the best,” the statement read.

The document further indicates that this statement would be distributed widely to major media outlets to maximize coverage.

In response to these claims, a spokesman for Full Scope firmly denied any involvement in the creation of the alleged contract.

They labeled the document as “entirely false and fabricated” and clarified that it was not created, issued, or authorized by their agency.

Full Scope has retained legal representation to address the situation but has expressed doubts about identifying the individuals responsible for the forgery.

“We have engaged our legal team to initiate proceedings against the individuals or entities responsible for the unlawful and injurious forgery of documents,” the agency stated.