In a move that has sent shockwaves across the British public and royal commentators alike, Meghan Markle’s newly launched rosé wine from her lifestyle brand “American Riviera Orchard” has stirred controversy—and not because of its flavor or pricing. The product’s unveiling coincided exactly with July 1st, the birthday of the late Princess Diana, triggering a wave of criticism, suspicion, and conspiracy theories that range from mere insensitivity to calculated provocation.
Was it simply an unfortunate coincidence, or was there more behind the timing of this product launch? As the internet buzzes and the tabloids dissect every detail, one thing is clear: this was no ordinary product drop. It was a moment drenched in symbolism, emotion, and public memory—fueling a firestorm of speculation and reigniting tensions between Meghan and the British royal family.
A Launch Clouded in Controversy
The release of the rosé was intended as part of Meghan’s soft launch of her upcoming luxury brand, American Riviera Orchard, which promises to combine the elegance of Montecito with a California-inspired lifestyle. The soft pink hue of the wine, the embossed logo, and the gold script label all screamed sophistication and modern royalty. But one thing overshadowed it all: the date—July 1st.
On this day, the world usually pauses to remember Princess Diana, the “People’s Princess”, who would have turned 63 this year. Social media was flooded with tributes, documentaries aired across the globe, and floral arrangements were laid at Kensington Palace. And then, amid all this, came an Instagram story from Meghan’s brand teasing the rosé, featuring influencers receiving exclusive samples of the unreleased bottle.
The Public Backlash
The reaction was swift and polarizing.
Critics argued the launch was “deeply disrespectful”, “tone-deaf”, and “calculated”. Some royal watchers accused Meghan of attempting to overshadow a sacred day in royal history, while others claimed it was a petty move in her ongoing feud with the Firm.
“She knew what she was doing,” one royal commentator said. “Launching a product, especially an alcoholic one, on the birthday of a woman who died tragically young in the public eye? It’s not a good look.”
Supporters, however, saw things differently. Many pointed out that Meghan has often paid tribute to Diana in subtle ways—through jewelry, speeches, and now possibly through her branding. Could this rosé be a homage, not a slight?
Still, the timing seemed all too precise. Was it truly accidental?
A PR Nightmare or a Calculated Risk?
Insiders suggest the launch was planned weeks in advance and the date may have been chosen intentionally—though for reasons far less sinister than many speculate.
“Launching on Diana’s birthday could have been seen as honoring her,” one PR expert explains. “It might have been intended as a tribute. But in the world of royal optics, even a slight misstep becomes a scandal.”
Others argue that the choice of July 1st was simply a PR blunder of epic proportions—a failure to read the cultural temperature. The royal family and Diana remain deeply emotional subjects for millions of people across the UK and the Commonwealth. Any perceived disrespect is likely to provoke outrage.
This isn’t the first time Meghan and Harry’s timing has been scrutinized. From Netflix documentaries to Oprah interviews, the couple has faced repeated accusations of overshadowing royal milestones, often unintentionally—or so they claim.
Symbolism and Suspicion
Digging deeper into the launch, many observers have pointed out the symbolism surrounding rosé wine itself. Its delicate color, its association with femininity, softness, and celebration—could it have been a subtle tribute to Diana’s spirit? Or is that reading too much into a marketing decision?
What makes this even murkier is Meghan and Harry’s complex relationship with Diana’s legacy. Harry has always spoken of his mother with reverence, often linking his decisions to her memory. Meghan, too, has been compared to Diana endlessly—both adored and vilified by the media, both seen as outsiders who shook up the royal system.
So why would Meghan choose this day for a commercial product launch? Was it a misguided homage? Or a silent protest?
Influencer Culture Meets Royal Legacy
Adding fuel to the fire was the method of the launch. Rather than a traditional press release, the wine appeared as part of glossy, carefully curated social media stories from influencers and friends of the Duchess. A new elite received hand-delivered gift baskets featuring the wine, accompanied by lavish floral arrangements. For critics, this only emphasized the tastelessness of the timing: using a day of mourning and remembrance to stage a lifestyle moment?
It raised broader questions: Can royalty mix with influencer culture? And can a figure as complex and polarizing as Meghan Markle ever make a move that won’t be scrutinized to death?
The Sussex Brand: Between Legacy and Luxury
The timing of the rosé drop also highlights the delicate balancing act the Sussexes are attempting. Since leaving the royal family, Meghan and Harry have built a brand that exists at the intersection of advocacy, celebrity, and commerce. But every commercial move they make risks backlash, especially when it’s seen as conflicting with their public values—or worse, appearing to exploit royal legacy.
And when that legacy includes someone as beloved as Diana, the stakes are even higher.
The launch of American Riviera Orchard is a bold pivot into the luxury lifestyle sector—think Goop meets Château Miraval. But launching a wine product, with its connotations of leisure and indulgence, on the birthday of a woman who died tragically and who fought tirelessly for humanitarian causes, creates cognitive dissonance for many.
Could the Backlash Have Been Avoided?
Some argue the entire scandal could have been avoided with one simple move: acknowledgment. A tribute post. A short message. A gesture of remembrance. Had Meghan released the product and included a heartfelt mention of Diana, the narrative might have shifted entirely.
Instead, silence left a vacuum—and in the world of royalty, a vacuum is always filled with suspicion.
Final Thoughts: Intent vs. Impact
Whether the launch was meant as a tribute, a bold brand move, or a simple oversight, the result has been a wave of speculation that threatens to overshadow what should have been a celebratory moment for Meghan’s business venture.
This incident underlines a truth Meghan and Harry have learned time and again: in the royal orbit, intention doesn’t matter as much as perception. The public decides the narrative—and once it’s set in motion, it’s hard to change.
So was it coincidence or calculated move? Tribute or provocation?
Only Meghan knows the truth. But the world, as always, is watching—and judging.