Samantha’s lawyer caught Meghan trying to destroy evidence related to the defamation case against Samantha. How dare she?

Megan Molel is reportedly attempting to delete potential evidence in her legal battle with her off sister Samantha McKell, as the lawsuit gains momentum.

Samantha claims that Megan’s public portrayal of her has been so devastating that she now struggles with everyday activities like grocery shopping.

Legal filings obtained for this report suggest that Megan’s legal team has been working over time to scrub certain communications and documents that could potentially damage defense.

The tension between the H sisters has been well documented since Megan’s relationship with Prince Harry became public knowledge.

This lawsuit takes their feud to an entirely new level, with Samantha seeking substantial damages for what she describes as a calculated character assassination orchestrated by Megan at the heart of the lawsuit on Megan’s comments during her famous interview with Oprah Winfrey.

Megan created a false narrative about growing up in virtual poverty when the reality couldn’t be further from the truth claimed.

Samantha’s attorney in court documents alleges that Megan’s team through various channels has actively worked to discredit Samantha and media circles effectively blacklisting her and preventing her from defending herself against what she character Tes as blatant facets.

The lawsuit also alleges that Megan’s team through various channels has actively worked to discredit Samantha and media circles effectively rendering Samantha unemployable in several fields.

The timing of Megan’s apparent evidence deletion efforts couldn’t be worse from a legal perspective, as Samantha’s legal team was tipped off about the attempts by a former staff member from the Sussex’s team who had become concerned about potential legalimpropriety.

The deletion allegations have raised the stakes considerably under US law parties, as the deliberate destruction of such evidence can result in significant legal penalties including monetary sanctions and adverse inferences by the judge or jury.

Related Posts

RENEE ZELLWEGER RELEASES PHOTO FROM TODAY SHOW APPEARANCE PROVING Archie IS A DOLL

 

‘Virgin River’ Renewed for Season 8 – Here’s Everything We Know!

Good news, Virgin River fans! Netflix has officially renewed the beloved small-town drama for Season 8! 🎉 That’s right—Mel, Jack, and the rest of the Virgin River crew are coming…

Forever Peter Kavinsky & Lara Jean: Fans Demand a New Movie About Their Wedding! 

Peter Kavinsky and Lara Jean Covey’s love story is far from over—at least, that’s what To All the Boys fans are hoping for! Ever since the Netflix trilogy wrapped up…

Captain America: Brave New World Director on Why Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk Didn’t Appear

Despite featuring several predominant characters from 2008’s The Incredible Hulk, including Tim Blake Nelson’s The Leader and Liv Tyler’s Betty Ross, Captain America: Brave New World did not include…

Meghan Markle posted and quickly deleted behind-the-scenes footage from her new Netflix series. Netflix CUTS Meghan Markle after trademark infringement?!

Days before her new Netflix show will be released, Meghan Markle appeared to post – and then quickly delete – behind-the-scenes footage from the upcoming series. Last…

‘Purple Hearts’ Part 2 Is Coming to Netflix – Here’s Everything You Need to Know! 

Netflix is about to break hearts all over again—‘Purple Hearts’ Part 2 is officially happening! 💔💜 Fans have been begging for a sequel ever since Cassie and Luke’s emotional love…