Meghan Markle’s legal team criticized her half-sister for “erroneously” failing to use her royal title when suing for defamation.
Samantha Markle has been fighting a years-long libel battle that has repeatedly faltered and is now at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. The saga revolves around Meghan’s comments to Orpah Winfrey and the content of her Netflix series Harry & Meghan.
However, one notable oddity surrounding the case is that it has been waged from the first moment to last with Meghan’s name written using the technically incorrect style common in the media.
On paper, the royal is Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, rather than Meghan Markle. News organizations, including Newsweek, refer to her using her pre-marriage name because that is how she is known to the public. Kate Middleton, formally Catherine, Princess of Wales, incurs the same fate.
For years, her legal team has done little more than describe her as te Duchess of Sussex while noting that she was “sued as Meghan Markle.”
The error has been so widespread in the filings that even the original judge in the case, Charlene Edwards Honeywell, sitting in the Middle District of Florida, has at points referred to the royal as “Meghan Markle.”
Now, though, more than two years after the case was first filed, Meghan’s lawyers have finally taken a swipe at how she was described, adding the word “erroneously.”
A filing seen by Newsweek read: “The Duchess of Sussex (erroneously sued as ‘Meghan Markle’), discloses the following individuals and entities who may have an interest in the outcome of this appeal.”
The statement is signed by Michael J. Kump, Meghan’s lawyer.
It is not clear exactly why Samantha Markle’s team filed the case using an incorrect form of her name, and it is possible they simply used the version seen in news articles. She has also changed her legal counsel since she first filed the case.
However, her lawyers have continued to describe the royal as “Meghan Markle” despite repeated filing by Meghan’s side describing her as “The Duchess of Sussex.”
As recently as August 2, their own court filing read: “The Appellant, SAMANTHA MARKLE (hereinafter referred to as ‘Samantha’) was the Plaintiff below, and the Appellee, MEGHAN MARKLE (hereinafter referred to as ‘Meghan’), was the Defendant below.”
Only time will tell whether Meghan’s lawyer’s latest effort affects how she is described in the case.
Needless to say, Meghan’s team has issued a broad brush denial of the allegations, describing many of the statements complained of as opinions that cannot give rise to a defamation claim.
They argue that Samantha has proven no malice and had no reason to doubt an interview given by Christopher Bouzy, founder of Bot Sentinel, for her Netflix series.
Samantha’s team argues that Bouzy painted her as a “racist troll,” though Meghan’s team has shrugged off the allegation.
The court filing read: “Even assuming that the Series did imply [Samantha] was a ‘racist troll’, that is a protected opinion because the terms ‘racist,’ ‘troll,’ and ‘racist troll’ are ‘not readily capable of being proven true or false’.”
“The District Court was correct that actual malice was absolutely lacking here,” Meghan’s lawyers continued. “There is no claim Meghan harbored serious doubts about the basis for Bouzy’s on-camera statements, as required for her to be liable for the statements of a source.”
News
Prince Harry’s 40th birthday plans revealed as Kate Middleton’s new ring explained
The monarch announced his cancer diagnosis in February. King Charles has given a rare update on his health while meeting with New Zealand’s female rugby team at Buckingham Palace on…
Prince Harry planning distance from Meghan Markle with birthday trip?
Prince Harry is reportedly excited about his 40th birthday trip Prince Harry is seemingly planning a solo trip, away from Meghan Markle, to mark his birthday. The…
Harry, Meghan Markle’s act of addressing to Princess of Wales as ’Kate’ infuriated Prince William, here’s why
The future British king, William, was upset after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly revealed dark secrets of royals in tell-all interviews, followed by memoir, ‘Spare’….
Heartbreaking Update! Prince George shocks fans with devastating news
The Prince and Princess of Wales have slowly begun introducing their kids to the spotlight, but they are taking it one event at a time. George has…
BREAKING: Pope Francis FINALLY Reveals Truth About Princess Catherine
Pope Francis apparently had some things to say about Kate Middleton. It seems that his medical team flew to London to be present for Kate Middleton’s abdominal…
NEW TITLE called Louise: she’s finally appointed as the new Duchess of Sussex as Meghan is KICKED OUT
In a surprising turn of events, Buckingham Palace has announced that Lady Louise Windsor, the 25-year-old daughter of Prince Edward and Sophie, Countess of Wessex, will be…
End of content
No more pages to load